Human Nature
The feelings and personality qualities that characterise the majority of people can be summed up as human nature. The various forms of personalities that numerous people can adopt are what make up human nature rather than the different personalities that differ from person to person. Consider human nature as a category under which traits of human nature are grouped. Many people have attempted to narrowly define what human nature is throughout history. Since the beginning of recorded human history, this has occurred. Humanity discovers more about itself and what it means to be human as it makes art and shares experiences. The idea of what human nature is as a result is continually shifting.
Human Nature Examples
Although the term “human nature” refers to the variety of experiences that any given person may have, there are various groups and subgroups that one’s human nature may belong to; these are referred to as “types of human nature.” The most widely recognised explanation of human nature is found in modern psychology, which divides it into four categories. It’s critical to keep in mind that all people fall into these broad categories of the subgroups. Even while two persons could share a similar type of human nature, their personalities might be quite different. The four most recent instances of human nature are listed below: Envious – These people all tend to be motivated by the perceptions and impressions they leave on other people. Optimistic – A genuinely optimistic view that prioritises others’ interests is what is meant by optimism. Pessimistic – A person who, at their core, makes judgments based on choosing the lesser of two evils. Trusting – These people place a strong emphasis on the value of relationships, regardless of success or failure. Even though one kind of being in the universe could appear to be more advantageous than another, it’s crucial to remember that every example has benefits and disadvantages. The Scientific View of Man The fact that we are physical, material beings is obvious. With the help of our five senses, we can verify every second of our life that we live in a material universe constrained by the boundaries of time and space. The human state is taken into account in all of its merely material occurrences in the scientific view of man. It makes the reductive assumption that the scientific method, together with the five senses, and the inductive technique of thinking, is the “best” approach to learn about “actual” things. While there is nothing wrong with starting with a scientific perspective because, as Aristotle noted, “all learning begins in the senses,” it becomes problematic if we finish with it. In this day of progressive thought, there is a delusion that would have us believe that, due to the rapid expansion of technology, we will soon be able to explain everything of reality through empirical means. In this modern era, the scientific concept of man has usurped authority. God and creation beliefs are increasingly regarded as superstitious. Even morality is now being reduced to material terms as philosophy has been. The scientific view of man contains many aspects that are objectively accurate, but it also has a very simplistic understanding of the human condition. When seen in isolation, it becomes a fatal simplification of the reality of human experience. It must necessarily view people as tools to be employed rather than as goals to be valued. If deemed essential, it can allow for the manipulation, use, and elimination of humans. Since we are rational beings, the scientific viewpoint places reason below science rather than the other way around. To explore how the gift of our mind offers understanding of the human situation not possible from the material sciences, we must look beyond the purely material. The Philosophical View of Man The proper definitions of the terms “person” and “nature” must be discussed in order to comprehend man philosophically. We cannot discuss “nature” in terms of human beings without bringing up a “person” associated with it. The first crucial point to note is that, rather than the other way around, it is the person who possesses the nature. Despite what the popular psychologists would have you believe, a person is not possessed by their nature. Nature provides an explanation for what we are, and people provide an explanation for who we are. Every being has a nature, thus when we enquire as to what a being is, we are enquiring as to what that nature is. But not all creatures are humans; only intelligent creatures are persons. Assume that a person is a being with consciousness, self-awareness, intellect, and will. These facts imply a broad range of intellectual and moral consequences that are absent in non-human organisms. In Theology and Sanity, Frank Sheed explains that our natures reveal who we are. It follows that we act as we do since that is how all living things behave. These facts let us identify another another difference between nature and people. We naturally speak, love, sing, and breathe, among other things. A stone cannot perform any of those things by nature, and a dog can only do one of those things by nature. Nature is therefore the source of both who we are and what we can do. Although it is in our nature to perceive the types of things we are capable of accomplishing, the decision to undertake them is made by the individual, not by our natures. According to Frank Sheed, “the person is that which does the acts; the nature is that by virtue of which the acts are performed, or better yet, that which is the source of the acts.” According to the philosophical perspective on man, we are moral as well as intellectual beings. It offers a framework for understanding the characteristics of human greatness, which are embodied by enduring virtues that all men of good will aspire to. The philosophical perspective of man should supplant and direct the scientific view of man because it is able to ground the material concepts of man in the underlying principles of existence. This thus makes it possible to find the impartial standard of virtue and vice that is open to all human souls who sincerely seek it. This perspective of man contains a lot of goodness, truth, and beauty, but it is not the whole picture. If one limits himself to a purely philosophical understanding of man and disregards the role of the Author of Life, he may fall short.
The Theological View of Man
The theological view is the most complete and all-encompassing picture of man. The theological perspective takes into account the nature, beginning, and destiny of the human being. Man was created both materially and in the likeness of God, according to given truth. According to .” Despite being made of material things, we are also imbued with immaterial life and the divinely endowed image of God Himself through our mind and volition. The theological explanation of man’s origin differs from the scientific explanation, which holds that man evolved accidentally as a kind of advanced ape. According to the theological perspective, God intentionally and out of an unfathomable act of love created man on purpose. In His created universe, God created the creature known as man. Except for God, who is the Uncreated Creator, everything in the universe was created by God. We are motivated to find out the purposes for which our Creator created man as we learn more about who we are and our divine origins. Like all other created things, man also tends to reach its natural conclusion. Since man was also created good, whatever that God has created should ultimately bring honour to him. The ultimate goal of man is to achieve eternal bliss. To possess God entirely in the beatific vision is to have our powers fully realised, fully perfected, and to find them at rest, in perfect happiness for all eternity face to face with God, as St. Thomas Aquinas eloquently expressed it.” Plato Aristotle Theory of Human Nature (What are we?) Rational, social animals. were parts of our nature. Theory of the self (Who are we?) Who we are depends on what kind of a soul we have a philosopher soul, a guardian or warrior soul, or an artisan soul. ?